October 07, 2005
Google Launches an RSS Aggregator
Just in time for Cool Tool Friday, Google has launched an RSS aggregator. It looks like Google is really starting to realize the value of Flash, as well. After moving Google Video over to Flash, they are now using Flash in their new RSS aggregator to play podcasts. Very cool stuff.
What are you using to aggregate? I'm using Bloglines now so I can switch between computers easily, but I might give the new Google Reader a try.
Update: Like Gmail, Google Reader even supports Vi keys. Nice!
Posted by cantrell at 10:56 AM. Link | Comments (3) | References
September 29, 2005
From Vim to Eclipse
I used to do almost all my coding (and editing in general) in vim. I actually think vim is one of the most brilliant pieces of software ever created -- obviously not because it's particularly feature rich, but because it is simple and elegant. I can use vim for editing almost any type of document, on any platform, and it can be used remotely through ssh just as easily as it can be used locally.
But I've actually been using Eclipse more and more lately in an attempt to modernize. I find the editor itself slower to use (not because of performance, but because vim was designed from the start to make navigation and editing as fast as possible), but in general, all of the features of Eclipse have actually made me more productive. In an attempt to get the best of both worlds, however, I'm now experimenting with a Vi plugin for Eclipse. It seems to work pretty well, though not exactly as I would expect in all circumstances, so I'm debating whether to stick with it, or just give up and surrender myself entirely to Eclipse. Whenever possible, I always try to stick with as much of the default functionality of an application as possible so that I can move from one machine to another and feel like I'm in the same environment. Ironically, that's precisely one of the things I like best about vim, and might be what prevents me from trying to integrate it into Eclipse.
Posted by cantrell at 09:35 AM. Link | Comments (12) | References
June 17, 2005
Cool Tool Friday: Google Launches Mobile Search
Being able to search with Google over your mobile device is nothing new, but being able to search Google for mobile results is. Google's new mobile search engine allows you to search for results that are specifically designed to work on your mobile device. That makes much more sense than searching a mobile version of Google for sites designed for your PC. Just go to Google.com on your mobile device, and look for the "Mobile Web (Beta)" option in the list below the text box. My Cingular data service is sketchy today, so I can't give a thorough going over, but I grabbed a friend's phone long enough to do a couple of searches, and so far, so good.
So how many people out there actually use their phones for browsing? What kinds of data services do you use on your phone, and how often do you use them? Frankly, I seldom do more than IM, SMS, a little email here and there, and check the occasional weather report, but I'm always looking for ways to get more out of my phone.
Posted by cantrell at 11:50 AM. Link | Comments (3) | References
May 20, 2005
Cool Tool Friday: Google Homepage
By now, I'm sure you've seen Google's new ability to create your own custom homepage. Just wanted to gather some thoughts. What do you think? I think it's pretty slick. I like the drag and drop functionality. Unfortunately everything they offer is information I pretty much already get elsewhere through aggregators or widgets of one type or another, but I'll see how having them all in one place on my browser's homepage works out for me.
Anyway, how many of you have switched the Google homepage? If you haven't, why? What do you have set as your homepage instead?
Posted by cantrell at 04:26 PM. Link | Comments (9) | References
April 29, 2005
Cool Tool Friday: Flash-based Email with Goowy
If you haven't done so already, you might want to check out the Goowy Mail beta for a very different web-based email experience. Goowy Mail is almost completely Flash-based, and offers a pretty comprehensive set of features like skins, POP integration, spell checking, junk filters, contacts, and more. Free accounts get you 100MB of storage, but Goowy Mail Plus and Platinum are coming soon, and will offer more space as well as additional features.
It's a pretty impressive app, and definitely worth looking in to. If you want to send some test emails to get a feel for it, my Goowy email address is cantrell@goowy.com.
Posted by cantrell at 04:14 PM. Link | Comments (13) | References
December 10, 2004
Cool Tool Friday 2: Google Suggest
Check out the latest project from Google labs: Google Suggest. As you type search terms, it will offer keyword suggestions in real time.
Posted by cantrell at 02:01 PM. Link | Comments (2) | References
Cool Tool Friday: MSN Direct Watches
I've gotten a few emails asking me what ever happened to Cool Tool Friday. Sorry I've been remiss. It's not due to a lack of cool tools so much as a lack of time. Anyway, enough excuses. On to my newest toy.
If you're a regular reader, you know how much I love watches. I've loved them all my life. All kinds of watches, too, from Timex to Rolex. I like traditional mechanical and automatic analog watches, as well as the bleeding edge digitals. So when I first came across Microsoft's SPOT watches, I was dying to try one, but there weren't any models available yet that I really liked, or that were cheap enough to buy as an experiment. Then Swatch introduced the Swatch Paparazzi and I made the leap.
The Swatch Paparazzi is a fantastic watch in and of itself even without the MSN Direct service. It has just about every time-related feature you could ask for in a watch from support for multiple time zones to a countdown timer to two programmable alarms (meaning you can set the date as well as just the time) to a full calendar interface. The backlight is every effective, the buttons have a perfect feel, and at $150, the price is right.
Then add on the MSN Direct service, and you have a very powerful tool. In addition to all the features I just named, I now have news headlines, news alerts, stock quotes, customizable watch faces, movie information, and weather. And there are several other "channels" I could add, as well (like sports and horoscopes) if I were interested.
What are the downsides? Well, you pay yearly for the MSN Direct service. I got the $40 plan (which doesn't include Outlook synchronization) which I personally think is fairly reasonable. And the other downside is the size of the watch. Since it has a built-in antenna, it's not exactly subtle, and doesn't quite say the same thing as a Seiko, Citizen, Omega, or a Tag Heuer. But it's a fun watch, nonetheless, and definitely a good addition to my collection.
For more information on the Swatch Paparazzi, you can read a review here. Also, anyone else out there wearing an MSN Direct watch right now? If so, what do you think?
Posted by cantrell at 12:33 PM. Link | Comments (2) | References
October 08, 2004
Cool Tool Friday: Community Vision 2.0
If you were hanging around the blogging scene last year around this time, you might remember Community Vision. Community Vision is an application that lets anyone publish images to a kind of public picture weblog. We launched it just before MAX last year, and collected a ton of cool pictures of all the goings on in Salt Lake City.
I just installed a new version of Community Vision, and I need your help testing it. The biggest changes I made were in the code that processes the emails and attachments. It should be significantly more robust now, and it should handle emails sent from all different types of devices. To help test, simply:
- Take any of type of digital picture with any type of device.
- Attach it to an email (using any type of device -- all phones and PDAs should work) and send it to vision2-at-markme.com (the -at- should be '@' -- we had a massive spam problem last year).
- The subject of your email will be the image's title, and the body will be the caption.
- Wait no more than five minutes, then check out your picture online.
Before participating, please check out the official rules and instructions by clicking on the "About Community Vision" link on the main Community Vision page. Also be aware that since this is a test, things may not go complete as planned, so if you notice that something has gone awry, let me know, and I'll get it fixed.
Posted by cantrell at 10:05 AM. Link | Comments (1) | References
September 24, 2004
Cool Tool Friday: The Danger (T-Mobile) Sidekick 2
I usually stay away from hardware on Cool Tool Fridays, but this week, I can't resist. After having my Sony Ericsson T616 quit on me about two weeks ago, I've been madly searching for a new phone/PIM device. The timing was all wrong because the new Treo 650s are due out sometime next month (as is the Sony Ericsson P910), both of which I had my eye on. I've never owned a "smart phone" before (combination PDA and mobile phone), so I thought it was time I gave it a try.
But I needed a phone now, and couldn't wait for products to finally ship, and for exclusive agreements with carriers to expire, etc. So I went to the AT&T store, and had a look around. I ended up walking out with the "top of the line" Nokia device which even the employees drooled over: the 6620. It was a great phone, which I'd been watching since its introduction a couple of months ago, and I found I immediately liked the Symbian OS. The problem was Mac compatibility. Usually, Nokia's Symbian devices are very Mac friendly, and I have no doubt that Apple iSync will eventually support the 6620, but as of now, the only "integration" you can do is to transfer vCards via Bluetooth (which only works marginally well since no phone number types are preserved).
Although I loved the phone, it wasn't doing me any good as a PIM device, and it's primary feature -- streaming video -- was too expensive for me to justify, so I decided to return it, and simply replace my T616 with the updated Sony Ericsson T637.
The T637 is a decent phone. It's very small, very light, and has a solid feature set (bluetooth, IR, etc.). It's also fully supported by iSync. What really sealed the deal, though, was the IM clients. The T637 comes installed with AIM, ICQ, and Yahoo! Messenger -- the three services I use on a regular basis. I loved the idea of always staying connected via IM, and I found my old T68i thumb-board interfaced perfectly with the T637.
I used the T637 for a few days, and was relatively happy with it except for:
- The camera was really bad. I don't really care that much about cameras built into phones (that's why I have a separate digital camera), but this was so bad that I couldn't even use it to take pictures for wallpapers.
- Sending instant messages was $.10 per message! Paying per IM defeats the purpose of IMing, in my opinion. No :), or "lol" or "brb", etc, if you have to pay for it.
- The phone had the same flimsy feel as the T616, which had just broken on me, and had gotten difficult to see due to massive amounts of dust under the screen.
I did some additional research, and came across the Danger Sidekick 2, sold exclusively though T-Mobile as of right now. A couple of very positive reviews from people I trust had me interested enough to take a chance, so I am now a few days into my 14 day evaluation, and so far, I think the Sidekick is the coolest device I've ever used. I won't go into too much detail since there are already several great reviews out there, but I'll mention a few of what I consider to be top features:
- The best key (thumb) board I've ever used on any device. Even better than my Sony Clie UX50.
- Cool flip screen.
- Nice form-factor. It may appear to be a little large at first, but I actually think the size is perfect. (I don't like phones that are so small that you can't even pin them against your ear with your shoulder.)
- For a single price, I get unlimited data (web browsing, email, instant messaging).
- Always connected AIM and Yahoo! Messenger clients. (No ICQ, though.)
- Auto synchronization of PIM applications with T-Mobile's online application.
This is a very different type of device which is easy to find faults with at first: no bluetooth, no IR, no huge library of 3rd party applications. But after using it, you begin to realize that Danger was really thinking outside of the box when they designed and built this thing. You don't need bluetooth and IR since updating information on the web updates your always-connected device in real time (amazing!). And no, I can't download a carb counting application or a tip calculator like I could with a Treo or Pocket PC smart phone, but the Sidekick either comes with or makes available all the basic applications I need, and they are better than many of their counterparts on other platforms. And finally, being a Mac user (primarily), I really appreciate the platform independent nature of the Sidekick. Whether I'm using Windows, Mac, or Linux, I can manage my information in the exact same way, from wherever I happen to be.
The Sidekick is a unique little device that certainly would not suit all smart phone users, but it's by far the best solution I've used -- in the last two weeks, anyway.
What mobile phone/PIM "solutions" are you into?
Posted by cantrell at 11:55 AM. Link | Comments (17) | References
September 13, 2004
Cool Tool Monday: GPS Navigation Systems
I missed Cool Tool Friday last week because I was on vacation, so I thought I'd sneak in a Cool Tool entry on a Monday. This week I'm excited about GPS navigation systems, and in particular, the Garmin iQue 3200. I've had the iQue for some time now -- probably about four months -- but taking it on vacation reinforces how cool it really is. I drove 4 hours to the beach, drove around a new area for a week, drove home, and drove some relatives to a distant airport I've never driven to before, and didn't get lost once (except when I wasn't using the GPS). But not getting lost is sort of a given with a GPS, I think, and isn't really the biggest advantage since even if you had directions scrawled on the back of a cocktail napkin, you probably wouldn't get lost. The real advantages are:
- Never having to get directions. Just hop in your car and go, whether you know where you're going or not.
- Automatic rerouting. If you miss a turn, the device will reroute in a matter of seconds, and fix your mistakes for you.
- Location-based services. Don't know about other GPS devices, but the iQue has a very comprehensive database of locations which you search for by all kinds of criteria, which means you don't even need to know where you want to go so much as what you want to do.
- Always having a map. Even if you aren't using your GPS device's ability to route, it's nice looking at a map of where you're going. You can see landmarks around you on the map that you can't see through your windows, and quickly evaluate shortcuts to avoid traffic problems.
The iQue is a handheld GPS rather than one that actually installs or is integrated into your dashboard. Since I drive a Jeep with a soft top, everything that might be overly tempting has to be removable and small enough that it can be locked in a console or glove box, so the iQue is perfect for me. In-dash units have a lot of advantages (always available, larger screen, integrated antenna), but the iQue actually has several advantages over many in-dash units (fast processor, expandable memory, handwriting recognition, PDA functionality, portable). As always, in a perfect world, I would have one of each, but as it stands, I'm pretty happy with the iQue.
Any other satisfied GPS users out there?
Posted by cantrell at 10:48 AM. Link | Comments (6) | References
September 03, 2004
Cool Tool Friday: Stock Tickers
It occurred to me one day how useless it is to get stock quotes via SMS on my cell phone once a day from Yahoo! since one particular snapshot wasn't telling me much. I could follow broad trends, but when it comes to making serious decisions, snapshots of delayed stock quotes are pretty useless.
I decided to install a stock ticker this morning to keep myself a little more current. (Ironically, it's a bad day to be watching the market!) I settled on wStock for OS X which is a free utility that scrolls symbols and fluctuations across your menu bar. It's free (which was my #1 requirement), and although the quotes are delayed (as all free quotes are, I think), I'm much better able to keep track of trends throughout the day.
I usually have to try several different applications before finding the best one out there, so I thought I get some feedback from you guys. Can anyone recommend a good stock ticker for OS X? What about Windows, for when I'm over on that side of the fence?
Posted by cantrell at 12:38 PM. Link | Comments (1) | References
August 11, 2004
Macromedia News on Your iPod: Day Two
We've really gotten a tremendous response from the community on Take-Away, the project Mike and I launched yesterday which allows you to read and listen to Macromedia news on your iPod. Thanks for all the great comments and suggestions!
I probably should have mentioned that Take-Away is still in "beta". That's just a fancy way of saying that while it should always be available, occasionally things might not work perfectly. In fact, I have spent my morning fixing the first two bugs found in production:
- The generated MP3 files were being generated at a speed which is not compatible with the MP3 decoder built into the Flash Player, so the feeds were being played at 2x speed. While that's great for productivity, and didn't do much for comprehension. I have Robert Hall to thank for getting me on the right track toward fixing this issue, and now, you can play the generated MXNA MP3 files through Flash (has anyone built anything that does this yet?).
- As you might imagine, I have to do a significant amount of processing of feeds and posts before converting them into sound, most of which is done through regular expressions. I use a regular expression to remove URLs so people don't have to sit there and listen to these long, 200 character URLs being monotonously read to them, however it turns out my expression was overly greedy, and was sometimes eating pieces of other people posts along with the URL. That's fixed now, too. (For those of you who had your posts verbally mangled, sorry!)
Let me know if you see any other issues, and keep the great comments and suggestions coming!
Posted by cantrell at 11:10 AM. Link | Comments (3) | References
August 10, 2004
Cool Tool Tuesday: Macromedia News on Your iPod
We're a little early for Cool Tool Friday, but I think this is a cool enough project that I'm bending the rules a bit. Mike Chambers and I just finished putting together and launching an application we're calling Take-Away which not only lets you read MXNA aggregated news as notes on your iPod, but also lets you listen to it, as well. The application checks over 300 Macromedia-related weblogs for new posts every hour, and regenerates the appropriate MP3s and note files. If you drive to work, listen to Macromedia news on your stereo. If you ride a bus or a train, read the news. If you work from home, play with it just for fun. And if you don't have an iPod, this is as good a reason as any to go get one!
See the Take-Away page for more information, and let me know if you have any suggestions for future versions.
Posted by cantrell at 09:40 AM. Link | Comments (5) | References
August 06, 2004
Cool Tool Friday: Firefox Search Engine Plugins
Having a search field embedded in your browser's toolbar is nothing revolutionary anymore. I mean, come on, it's August 2004 already -- who actually goes to Google to use Google anymore? But extending your browser's search functionality to tons of other searchable sites I think is still pretty cool, and worthy of a Cool Tool Friday quick mention.
If you use Firefox, choose the "Add engines..." item from the search plugins drop-down box, then go crazy installing search plugins. Having tons of search plugins installed saves you from having to actually go to a site before using it. Throughout the day, all those clicks you didn't have do and pages you didn't have to load can really add up, translating into more time working, which, of course, is what we all want, isn't it?
I currently have plugins installed for Amazon, Dictionary.com, eBay, Froogle, Google, a few specialized dictionaries, macosxhints, Macromedia, Slashdot, and my favorite, TinyURL. Anyone have any indispensable search plugins they want to share?
Some additional resources:
- Mike Chamber's Macromedia search plugins
- Jon Udell on how to create these little gems
- The Mozilla search plugin registry
- Code completion. Nothing fancy (this thing needs to remain as light-weight as possible, I think), but it would be nice if, when I opened a tag, a closing tag appeared. (To be fair, one can use code snippets to achieve similar functionality.)
- I'd like to be able to have my code snippets in drawer rather than a separate window. The one thing I don't like about OS X is that you tend to have too many windows floating around.
- I'd like to be able to link to CSS files using a URL rather than having to have them in a local file. It would be nice to be able to write blog posts while referencing my style sheet on my weblog server.
- Finally, if I double click on something in the preview pane, it would be cool if the editing pane jumped to that piece of code.
- Accurate
- Durable
- Maintenance free
- Versatile (lots of time-related features)
- Digital (I prefer analog)
- No countdown timer (one of the most useful features of a watch!)
- The solar panels are too small to gather light efficiently
- Networked computers talking over TCP/IP.
- My phone talking to my PDA via infrared and/or bluetooth.
- My PDA talking to my PC via WiFi talking to another PC via WiFi sending a signal to my stereo via RCA and playing MP3s through iTunes.
- Tapping on a button on my PDA which makes an HTTP request through GPRS to a web server which executes an OS level command which relays a message to the device plugged into the serial port which sends a radio signal to an X10 device plugged into an electrical socket which uses the X10 protocol to turn a light on downstairs. (Yes, it really works!)
- "Wednesday, switch to iTunes."
- "Wednesday, play random music."
- Rulers - On-screen rulers that measure distances and angles
- Screens - A dynamic view of smaller screen sizes and web browser content areas
- Loupe - A magnifying glass that gives you a close-up view of your work
- Guides - Markers for precise horizontal and vertical alignment
- Frames - Markers for precise width, height & origin alignment
- Crosshair - Finds the exact location on screen
Posted by cantrell at 12:21 PM. Link | Comments (2) | References
July 30, 2004
Cool Tool Friday: Tumult HyperEdit
I'm writing this post right now with an application called Tumult HyperEdit. HyperEdit is a relatively light-weight and simple HTML editor whose primary feature is a live, real-time preview pane. It's no replacement for a tool like Dreamweaver, but it has certainly found its place among my toolset.
The preview pane actually updates as you type, so you have constant visual feedback. I haven't tried any type of complex layout yet, but so far, for relatively simple HTML documents, I have found the workflow to be a very useful. The preview pane uses Safari's rendering engine, so it's very quick and very compliant.
There are a few other nice features like code snippets, PHP support (you can actually execute PHP scripts), and the ability to link to external CSS files. There are a couple of features I would like to see added, though:
Don't let a couple of feature requests discourage you, though. This is a tool definitely worth checking out.
Posted by cantrell at 12:52 PM. Link | Comments (2) | References
July 23, 2004
Cool Tool Friday: I Now Have the Coolest Watch in the Country
Ask some what the coolest watch is, and they might tell you the Suunto x9. Others will may prefer the new Timex Ironman Data Link, the old Timex Messenger (classic!), an MSN Direct enabled watch, or a good solid Seiko Kinetic Chronograph. Although I either already have, or would love to have, each and every one of these, I think the watch that was delivered to my house this morning beats them all.
I like my devices to specialize. In other words, I like them to perform one primary function, and to do that function really well. That's why I don't have a PDA with GSM capabilities. I like my PDA (Clie UX50) and my phone (Sony Ericsson 610) to do their own things, and to do them as well as they can. Integration is great (infrared, bluetooth, etc.), but I haven't seen many devices that can do multiple things as well as devices that specialize.
Which is why I like Casio G-Shock. I like watches to be:
I recently bought a Casio Solar Waveceptor G-Shock (GW-300) which I wrote about early last month, and while I like it very much and have gotten a lot of use out of it, it isn't perfect. It's shortcomings include:
So I decided one day that I was going to find the perfect watch no matter what it took, and although it took over a month and more money than I had planned on spending, I finally found and got my hands on the Casio GW-1100J. It has all the features of the GW-300, but it also fixes all the shortcomings. It's analog (and digital), is has a countdown timer, and the entire face is a solar panel so it gathers light more efficiently than the GW-300. And, of course, its atomic, so it never needs to be set, and it's shock resistant and water resistant up to 200 meters. (Naturally, it has all the other basic features like multiple alarms, world time, etc.).
It wasn't easy to get, though. This model isn't available in the US, and although there is one similar stainless steel version available, once I saw the all black (with inverted LCD), I had to have it. To make matters worse, this particular watch is apparently even difficult to get in Japan! I called Casio several times, and they weren't able to help (they weren't even able to give me a phone number in Japan that someone would answer in English). I watched eBay for weeks, send probably five or six unanswered emails, and contacted a friend of mine in Japan who couldn't help because he was just about to leave for Palau for a month. I finally got in touch with an Australian in Kyoto who knew a supplier who had 2 left. Never having met this guy in my life, and never even having talked to him, I took a chance (he has very good eBay feedback), sent him some money via PayPal, and today, I have the 1100J on my wrist!
This may very well be one of the most exclusive watches in the entire country!
Posted by cantrell at 01:32 PM. Link | Comments (9) | References
July 16, 2004
Cool Tool Friday: Devices Talking to Each Other. Literally.
Before two devices can "talk" to each other (by "talk", I mean in some way integrate with each other, or exchange data), they have to have some sort of protocol in common. Some examples include:
Anyway, you get the point. As long as two devices have a protocol in common, they can usually "talk" and be integrated in some way, and you can even chain devices together through multiple protocols to achieve something very unusual like a PDA "talking" to a lamp through the Internet.
I bought a digital voice recorder the other day, and I was surprised by how feature rich it was. One of the most interesting features is the ability to set an arbitrary time and date in the future for a recording to be played. Essentially, it's an alarm clock with a custom alarm. Since my Mac has very impressive voice recognition built-in, I figured it would be kind of interesting to use the voice recorder as a kind of cron or scheduled tasks application. All I have to do is record the commands to make my Mac perform an operation, set a date and time, and leave the recorder near my Mac's microphone.
I downloaded a bunch of iTunes speakable items scripts to make iTunes "speakable", and recorded the following:
("Wednesday" is the name of my computer, which is required before giving it a command.)
I had to make the recordings a couple of different times to get the timing and the clarity right, but now it works perfectly. That night, I configured the recording to play at 7:00 AM the next morning, and I woke up to a random iTunes track playing. The nice thing about the speakable items scripts I downloaded is that there's one entitled "silence" and "shut up" so I was then able to stop the music by yelling at my computer, and then go back to sleep.
Admittedly, the end result wasn't earth-shattering. I'm sure there are several other ways I could have woken up to a random iTunes track that would have been faster and easier to set up. But it's not the end result that interests me. What interests me is that it was the first time I had every integrated two devices using the protocol of human speech, and it worked wonderfully. Using human speech as a protocol between devices allows us to easily eavesdrop, and even participate in the "conversation", or intervene in ways bluetooth and infrared obviously don't allow. Rather than dialing my cell phone with my PDA via bluetooth, maybe some day my PDA can speak instructions (my cell phone already allows for voice dialing) which means I can catch any mistakes that were made (maybe I tapped on a home number rather than cell phone number), and I could also use the exact same mechanism to dial my phone automatically myself. Or any other device capable of talking could use the same "protocol" as well. I can imagine in the future robots talking to each other in plain English so that we can be certain they aren't conspiring behind our backs (just in time for the opening of "I, Robot"!), or at least about to perform some function that we would rather they didn't.
Ok, well, this conversation is getting pretty off-topic, even for a Cool Tool Friday post, so I'll end it here, and let you pick it up in the comments section. Can you think of any other cool scenarios for using the human voice as a machine protocol?
Posted by cantrell at 12:15 PM. Link | Comments (8) | References
July 09, 2004
Cool Tool Friday: Picking Colors With Color Schemer
I got a request to talk abut Color Schemer in the next Cool Tool Friday, so I checked it out, and here's what I think so far.
Very cool tool. And simple. Color Schemer is great for people like me who don't have much design sense, or are too lazy to put much thought into design. I usually have to steal color schemes off of other sites on the web, or either hire a designer, or beg one to give me some free advice. Now I can try using Color Schemer to come up with complementary colors, and I can blame the application if they look like crap.
The application is small and efficient, which I really like. I usually prefer little apps that do one thing very well rather than big, bloated apps that try to do everything at once. Color Schemer just does one thing, and it seems to do it very well.
I also like the fact that part of using Color Schemer is understanding a little about color and design. Rather than just telling you what colors to use, you are encouraged to actually learn a little about color, color theory, and color combinations which you can do quickly and easily through the Color Schemer online tutorial.
I also like the little features that help integrate it with web development workflow, like being able to easily copy HEX colors to your clipboard, and the ability to save color schemes.
What don't I like about it? Well, I've only been playing with it for about 45 minutes now, so I don't have enough experience with it yet to say whether it really works or not. I haven't used any of its recommended schemes to build a site with yet, so for all I know, it could turn out looking horrible, but I think as long as you pick reasonable colors to start with, it will pick reasonable colors to compliment them.
One thing I don't understand about Windows applications is why you always have to install them. I know most people don't give this a second thought, but since I'm also a Mac and Linux user, it really bugs me that I have to install even the smallest of applications on Windows. Why can't I just download an EXE file, put it where I want, create shortcuts where and if I want. Then, I can just delete the application if I don't want it anymore without having to go through all the trouble of uninstalling it, and further fragmenting my hard drive. This is obviously not specific to Color Schemer, but it bugs me nonetheless.
Another potential disadvantage that I can see so far is possibly the price. Color Schemer is $34.99 while Color Schemer Studio is $49.99. I don't think that's unreasonable, but it's a little hard to swallow when you just need a few color suggestions every couple of months or so. (I would find it easier to pay for an RSS aggregator that I use several times a day, for instance.) Obviously the more you use it, the more it makes sense, but if you were the type of person who needed to pick out colors on a daily basis, you are probably more of a designer who wouldn't use a tool like this at all. This is a very small point, though, since if it saves me from having to consult with a designer even once, it has probably paid for itself. I just feel like I'm constantly reaching for my credit card these days, and half the applications I open up are begging me to purchase them. I should probably just get over it, stop being cheap, and start supporting the hard-working developers building these cool tools.
Anyway, does anyone have any experience with this tool who would like to comment? How about similar tools? Anything for other platforms?
Posted by cantrell at 11:34 AM. Link | Comments (10) | References
July 02, 2004
Cool Tool Friday: The Wayback Machine
I apologize in advance for the abbreviated post today -- especially on Cool Tool Friday -- but I'm about to get on a plane, so I only have a few minutes to get this up.
Anyway, check out the Wayback Machine, both for fun, and as a web development reference. From their website:
"Browse through 30 billion web pages archived from 1996 to a few months ago."
Just type in a URL, choose one of the archived dates, and journey back through time. Very cool service. Those of you who are nostalgic for the old, pre-Dylan Macromedia website, knock yourselves out!
Posted by cantrell at 09:19 AM. Link | Comments (3) | References
June 18, 2004
Cool Tool Friday: Web Development Utilities
About six years ago, a friend of mine and I built a tool using Visual Basic which we called PixelRuler. All it was was a window that displayed its outer dimensions in the center, and updated dynamically when you increased or decreased its size. We used it while developing web applications to make sure images or other elements weren't pushing out the boundaries of our tables (everything was table-based back then).
Once I left the company I was working for at the time, I switched to a Linux workstation, and was doing more programming and back-end development than design, so I forgot about the tool. At Macromedia, however, I do an equal amount of front- and back-end work, so once again, I found I needed a good tool for quickly measuring the dimensions of graphics and objects in my browser.
Today's Cool Tool Friday post was going to be about a tool for OS X called Trilithon Rulers by a company called Trilithon, and I was later going to do another post about another OS X tool called DigitalColor Meter (an eyedropper tool for getting HEX and RGB colors from anything on your screen). Ironilcally enough, however, when I was reading FlashLounge this morning, I came across a post by Lee Probert describing a tool called xScope by ARTIS Software and The Iconfactory that comes with screen rules, an eyedropper tool, and much more:
A single-user license for xScope is $14.95, which I think is very reasonable. I haven't actually purchased it because I haven't finished evaluating it yet, but so far, I'm pretty impressed.
What kind of similar web development utilities do you use?
Posted by cantrell at 01:43 PM. Link | Comments (6) | References
June 11, 2004
Cool Tool Friday: Gmail and Other Web-based Email
Today's Cool Tool Friday topic is web-based email, and specifically Gmail. I got a beta account a few days ago (thanks to my old friend Paul Arce), and I immediately started playing with it. It didn't take me long to find a couple of bugs, but that's what betas are for, and generally speaking, I'm very impressed. There's no question that it's extremely well implemented, although whether that will translate into people switching accounts, I'm not entirely sure.
But before we get into Gmail, why use web-based email at all? I switched to web-based email a long time ago so that I would be free to switch ISPs at my leisure. I hated having my email associated with my ISP as much as I hated having my mobile number associated with my mobile service provider. I don't care much for Hotmail, so I've been using Yahoo! mail for about five years, and I've had great success with it (actually, I use POP to access my Yahoo! mail, so the primary benefit is not being locked into an ISP). As a long-time web-based email user, therefore, I was very curious when I first heard about Gmail, and couldn't wait to get my hands on an account.
What I like best about Gmail is probably the efficiency. It works with the same miraculous and blinding speed as Google which makes using a web interface much more bearable than it would otherwise be. Of course, I also like the ability to use Google search technology to search my email. And no, the ads don't bother me. They are tasteful in their appearance, relatively inconspicuous, and actually not entirely unwelcome. Of course, given the choice, I would opt out, however there will probably be times when they might actually come in handy. Well-targeted advertising is good for the consumer as well as the advertiser. And there are no viral marketing messages in the footers of your emails!
Gmail's general email model is different than other email clients. It doesn't use your typical folder metaphor. In fact, there are no folders at all. You can "label" messages in your inbox with custom labels, but that does not file them away and take them out of your inbox (applying a label to a message is nothing more than a quick way to filter your email). There are three ways to get an email out of your inbox: report it as spam, throw it away, or archive it.
The model is clearly designed to cater to the way most people use email. Most people (from my experience) do not actually take the time to file away email messages in neat little hierarchical folders so they can easily find them again later. Most people have hundreds or thousands of email messages in their inboxes, and rely on messages being marked as unread to know what they should pay attention to. Gmail allows you to manage your inbox with a single click. If you want to save a message, just archive it. Don't worry about where it goes, and about creating an intuitive folder structure so that you can find it again later. Just click the archive button and forget it. Once it comes time to retrieve it, Gmail provides you with a fairly sophisticated search interface which allows you to search by multiple criteria. It even has an intelligent date parser so you can type dates in any way you want (e.g. today, Friday, June 11, 6/11/2004). If you really need to keep tabs on an email, you can apply a label to it so that clicking on the label name in the left-hand column will retrieve it instantly.
I think this is a great model that most people will probably appreciate and find very intuitive, however it honestly makes me a little nervous. I'm one of those few who meticulously files away all but the most insignificant of emails, and can usually find what I'm looking for in a matter of seconds. Email is very important to me, so I'm a little reluctant to drastically change the way I use it. On the other hand, email needs to evolve, and I think Gmail is an important evolutionary step, so perhaps I will leave my old ways behind and try something new. After all, if Gmail were just like Yahoo!, what would be the point? What would there be to get excited about?
The biggest issue I have with switching my personal email account from Yahoo! to Gmail is that I use POP to retrieve my Yahoo! mail which allows me to read it (and organize it) right alongside my Macromedia email, and my other email accounts. If I were to switch my personal email account to Gmail, I would have my email in two different places, and have to stay on top of two very different interfaces. Gmail may someday provide POP access, however they also may not since retrieving your Gmail mail through a local POP client will circumvent all of Gmail's innovations, not to mention their advertising. If they go this route, it will almost certainly not be free (which I think is fair enough). They may also eventually release a local Gmail client which would seamlessly integrate with your web mail (and bring ads right to your desktop), which would be interesting, but it still would not allow me to use Outlook or Apple Mail.
As I said, I've been using Yahoo! mail for probably about five years, and I've been very happy with it. It's gone through some rough patches, but for the most part, the price is great, and it's very reliable. I hardly ever use the web interface, but when I do, I find it adequate (not nearly as nice as Gmail's), and I like that my Yahoo! account givesme access to so many other services, as well (Yahoo! Messenger, mobile alerts, Yahoo! finanace, etc.).
How many others out there use web-based email? Which service do you use, and why? What do you like and hate about it? Gmail users, what do you think of it so far? Are you a convert, or just playing with the idea, like I am?
Posted by cantrell at 12:49 PM. Link | Comments (9) | References
June 04, 2004
Cool Tool Friday: RSS Aggregators
I'm going to pick off another easy one for the second installment of Cool Tool Friday: RSS Aggregators. I split my time between Windows and OS X these days, and I have aggregators for both that I like. For Windows, I use SharpReader. It seems solid, stable, and fast. It has a nice search function, allows you to organize your feeds into folders, and uses cool looking (by Windows standards) alert windows when new posts come in.
On my Mac, I use NetNewsWire by Ranchero Software. It's pretty similar to SharpReader in terms of looks and functionality. It's rock solid and very fast, and allows for a fair amount of layout customization. The free version (NetNewsWire Lite) is very functional, but lacks some of the layout flexibility, search functionality, and the ability to make weblog posts. Both versions have the ability to discover RSS feeds given a site's URL, which is a nice, time-saving feature.
Another one to keep an eye on for OS X is Pulp Fiction by Freshly Squeezed Software. In terms of functionality, Pulp Fiction is actually my favorite, however I haven't found it to be stable enough for day-to-day use with the number of feeds I aggregate (probably close to 200). I'm actually a little surprised they are selling it with as unstable as it currently is, but as soon as they get the kinks worked out, I will happily pay the $25 for a full license. It takes a very unique approach to RSS aggregation, treating it more like mail (and is, in fact, modeled after Apple's Mail application). Rather than putting feeds into categories, you can filter posts into folders, and read new posts in an "inbox". I really like the concept, and will hopefully be using it full time relatively soon, assuming it is still being actively developed and improved.
What do you like for RSS aggregation, and why?
Posted by cantrell at 01:29 PM. Link | Comments (14) | References
May 28, 2004
It's Cool Tool Friday!
Every Friday, I'm going to start posting about little tools I've found recently that make my job easier, allow me to stay better organized, provide me with new and interesting functionality, or otherwise make using a computer for a minimum of 12 hours a day more enjoyable. I'll post both Mac and PC tools since I realize there are still some PC users out there. :)
If you have experience with the tool I'm posting about, please post a comment letting us know what you think of it. If you use a similar tool (on any platform), please let us know about that, as well. My goal is an ambitious one: to improve my readers' productivity and efficiency by introducing and sharing new free or low-cost tools and functionality. Of course, my posts will hopefully just be catalysts -- the comments will probably end up being the more complete story.
Let's start with an easy one. Everyone uses instant messaging, right? (Is there anyone out there who doesn't?) And may of us probably use clients capable of handling multiple protocols. I've used several, and my favorite is Proteus (OS X only). It's extremely powerful, robust, aesthetic, and even a little bit fun (cool icons). I've been using it for about a year, but I recently upgraded to version 4.02 which is a big improvement. Lots of little bug fixes, and very nice enhancements. Proteus also has a pretty decent community in place to help out when things go wrong (which is very rare, but inevitable when using any "unofficial" messaging client).
What instant messaging client do you use? What do you like about it and hate about it? Anyone out there have any experiences with Proteus they would like to share? Is there another client I should be evaluating?
Posted by cantrell at 12:01 PM. Link | Comments (9) | References