« Firefox testimonials | Main | Shea's gang on Adobe »

December 05, 2005

Player FAQ change

Player FAQ change: New text now: (Q) What are Adobe's plans for Flash Player and Adobe Reader? (A) Our long-term plan is to develop a 'universal client' by combining PDF, Flash and HTML in a single, integrated runtime. Of course, we will continue delivering the Flash Player as a small, efficient runtime for content and applications on the web, and Adobe Reader for viewing and interacting with PDF documents and forms. The integration of these technologies into a unified framework creates a ubiquitous platform that runs on virtually every device, and dramatically expands the opportunities to create compelling solutions." Readings of the prior text have been discussed by Colin Moock, Aral Balkan, John Gruber, and Todd Dominey have already entered public discourse... fortunately these folks did link to source material, so people following their links will catch the less-ambiguous new version.

Posted by John Dowdell at December 5, 2005 03:42 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mtadmin/mt-tb.cgi/6888

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Player FAQ change:

» Adobe is planning on combining Flash Player and Acrobat Reader? from kottke.org remaindered links
http://whatdoiknow.org/archives/002519.shtml... [Read More]

Tracked on December 6, 2005 06:18 PM

Comments

I think it makes sense to augment the capabilities of Central/Apollo to include PDF capabilities. I'm happy with this direction. It also makes sense that the integration of .swf+.pdf will take several years, and it will be done right - as opposed to a rapid lash-up.

But the universal (desktop/console) client (Apollo) needs to hit the streets soon. Developers need to know about it now. You need a compelling economic incentive to encourage developers to adopt the flash platform, as opposed to the competition. We need to know how the 'solutions' layer (ref: to Kevin Lynch's white paper), will enable consumers to try and buy our applications.. Adobe need to establish a market presence now, or leave things wide open to the competition. Adobe need to think about how the desktop and mobile technologies will interact. How these markets will cross-stimulate and encourage growth in use of the flash platform. You need to focus developers on a new class of ubiquitous applications.

When will things start to happen?

Posted by: Daniel Freeman at December 5, 2005 05:21 PM

Maybe the new runtime should make coffee also? This is the sort of direction that kills an excellent product "let's turn it into the swiss army knife of the web".
How often have we all seen universal turn into unusable.

Posted by: Ray Ketcham at December 5, 2005 05:32 PM

Thanks for the amends. I'm sure you're well aware that the Flash community's biggest fear in the Adobe acqusition is the idea that the Flash Player will become a bloated, 20-odd megabyte download that will attempt to do everything on the web but only succeed in alienating users. And I'm also sure you have no plans to do this... so please tread carefully!

From my understanding, it would be very possible for a future version of the Flash Player to read in PDFs and display them natively in the FP rather than just bolting on Adobe's current PDF reader.

Well, hopefully that's what you're planning!

Posted by: Paul Neave at December 6, 2005 07:14 AM

I'm satisfied with Adobe Reader for reading pdf-helps and science materials and I really don't need more

Posted by: Eugene at December 6, 2005 09:33 AM

Nice inacessible CAPTCHA there, JD.

The world doesn't need another browser that handles PDF and Flash. We have enough such browsers. (Start with Safari.) The last thing developers need is another browser with quirks to work around. Even if you use the Opera rendering engine, which would seem likely based on previous business dealings, I guarantee that the Flash and PDF "integration" will cause further bugs.

Then of course you have to deal with Web-browser, Flash, and PDF accessibility simultaneously. Do you really think that will be nice and easy? Will it not actually be more than three times as hard as making each of those technologies accessible?

Posted by: Joe Clark at December 6, 2005 01:30 PM

Thanks for the amends. I'm sure you're well aware that the Flash community's biggest fear in the Adobe acqusition is the idea that the Flash Player will become a bloated, 20-odd megabyte download that will attempt to do everything on the web but only succeed in alienating users. And I'm also sure you have no plans to do this... so please tread carefully!

Posted by: Chris at December 7, 2005 02:56 AM