« Flash stick author | Main | World Cup apps? »
June 07, 2006
Chizen on Microsoft
Chizen on Microsoft: I know a lot of people are seeking info on this, and here's the first report I've seen beyond the paragraph issued last week by PR. Patrick Seitz of Investor's Business Daily reports on Adobe CEO Bruce Chizen, speaking at the World Business Forum in Chicago on Tuesday. There are two classes of attribution: some direct quotes, and some paraphrased paragraphs. I do not yet know of a direct transcript or written Adobe summary, or whether the quotes were accurately transcribed, but I'll check for more in the office tomorrow. Here's the core of the quotes: "Free is good -- unless free ends up eliminating the competition and the consumer ultimately ends up with less choice... What I want to make sure of is that future innovation and competition does not get stomped on by Microsoft." I'll add more in comments here as I find further context.
Posted by John Dowdell at June 7, 2006 05:26 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://weblogs.macromedia.com/mtadmin/mt-tb.cgi/7493
Comments
I guess I'm not following the details close enough. Is PDF an open standard for software makers for both reading and producing PDF content or not? Or is there a monopoly clause in the 'open-ness'? If I wrote some software today that exported to PDF then later it became popular such that nearly everyone had a copy, would I later get sued by Adobe retroactively?
The other thing I'm not clear on - Microsoft is not a free product, it must be purchased (just like Adobe Acrobat), so what is the issue exactly, the wide deployment of Office compared to Acrobat?
Thanks, John. I know you'll do your best to make clearer these muddy waters.
Posted by: Jeff Schiller at June 7, 2006 10:14 PM
That pretty much confirms what I thought was going on. It's not an anti-MS bias, they just wanted to give upstarts like OOo a fighting chance now that their gaining some popularity.
Of course, I'm sure selling millions of copies of Acrobat to enterprises married to MS Office isn't a bad reason either. ;)
Posted by: PaulC at June 8, 2006 08:25 AM
Why have WinZip never been incorporated into Windows/MSOffice? Essentially it's as useful as quickly printing to pdf from within Office. There are tools and products like Acrobat and Winzip that can easily be downloaded. Not everything needs to be packed tightly with MS.
Posted by: Stefan at June 8, 2006 10:49 PM
I don't think many people buy this talk that Adobe is somehow playing the hero and saving the world from Microsoft crushing innovation. It's all about Adobe not wanting to lose Acrobat revenue. It has nothing to do with anything else. PDF support has been the #1 most customer requested feature for the Office team for quite some time now. It's sad that Adobe has to be a little bitch about this. I feel sorry for all you Macromedia guys who used to work for a company that everyone generally liked...
Posted by: Jesse Ezell at June 9, 2006 08:41 AM
Jeff, I never do well in those "'is' [something] [some label]" discussions... "Is Britney Spears art?", "Is peanut butter fattening?" "Is some format an open standard?"... Wikipedia has background on how I think here.
I still don't know any of the content of those purported exec meetings. I don't know what the actual issues are... I just know the claims raised in the media campaign. Fortunately I don't need to act on that story myself, and instead can afford to wait and learn more.
Posted by: John Dowdell at June 9, 2006 12:04 PM